|
Joe Abercrombie’s very good taste can be seen soon
as he has J. R.R. Tolkien and George R.R. Martin among his most important
literature references. Actually, it seems what most distinguish him from the
other two are the R.R. they have between their name and surname, because for
the rest, Abercrombie’s prose is as poetic as Tolkien’s and as brutal as
Martin’s; traits that can be seen in his literary debut, The First Law trilogy, which last in his subsequent independent
novels.
Adria’s News talks to Joe Abercrombie at the
Celsius 232 Festival and realizes that despite his youth, it all seems to
indicate that his name will soon be among the greatest authors of fantasy,
although he doesn’t want to be limited to this genre. He’s written adventure
novels, a war story and even a western. “I have tried a lot of things, like
Tarantino”, he admits, “although I’ve done it in a much better way”.
Your fellow writer Adrian Tchaikovsky has
warned me. He says that you bite. Should I be afraid?
[Laughs] I
wouldn’t be afraid, no. I only bite when I’m angry or upset and I’m sure your
questions will be hugely complimentary, so it shouldn’t be a problem.
I don’t think so either. You already came to
Celsius 232 last year. Why are you here again?
Well, they
asked me to come and I had a great time last year and I get on very well with
the organizers, so I just enjoy hanging out here. And I think it’s a good place
to come again. There’s a nice atmosphere here.
The big star last year was George R.R. Martin.
I guess you talked with him…
Yes, yes! I
think he’s a guy who is very much down to earth. Success hasn’t gone to his
head, he’s very grounded, very ordinary, really, and he enjoys working with
other writers a lot, writing on anthologies, plus he’s always been part of the
fandom and a figure in conventions.
Maybe he’s so grounded because he met success
when he was older…
Exactly, and
he’s always been very inclusive and a very good guy to talk to and he’s obviously
become a huge figure now, it’s quite intimidating. But he’s one of the very few
living writers that have been quite influential for me. I read A Game of Thrones back in the 90s and it
was like a light bulb for me.
On your webpage I read an article in which you
say that if you hadn’t read A Game of Thrones
you probably wouldn’t have written The First
Law trilogy.
Yeah, yeah,
I think it’d have been something very different, in a way, so yes. Also, there
are not many other writers I could name that had this personal input, so it
really left a mark on me.
George
R.R. Martin “He was like a light bulb
because he’s one of the few living writers that have been quite influential for
me”
Three very thick books compose The First Law series. It’s a very heavy
debut, right?
Looking back
it’s not the cleverest move, in a way. I should have done a couple of short
stories; that’d have been the sensible thing to do, but I suppose you end up
writing the sort of thing you’ve read and that was the format I was interested
in, and when I thought of writing something epic fantasy trilogies always
attracted. That was where I wanted to go.
Why a trilogy, then?
The Lord of the Rings is a trilogy…
So I assume you are one of those writers who
contemplates The Lord of the Rings as
a Bible…
Yes, because
it is, in a way. It is for me, and I think three is a natural shape, it makes
sense, it’s a start, middle and end, and it’s a kind of an introduction, a
development and a conclusion. Three acts it’s a shape that makes sense, look at
the theatre… And three big books seemed a solid number.
After the trilogy you published a few
standalone novels. But they were all set after the trilogy and not before. Why?
I guess the
thing I most get asked is to write Logan’s history, Logan’s childhood. I’ve
been asked this for so long and I don’t know I feel that going forward is
generally the best way to go. It’s easier making mistakes going back and mess
up your own timeline a bit and I like the idea of the ambiguity in the past,
you know. I suppose that the past is made of stories of the people in the
present so you don’t know exactly what truth is. I’ve done a few short stories
that are kind of pick up episodes that are important in The First Law and that was a collection that will come up in a
year. So I think I’ll keep going forward in full-length books.
Best Served Cold is your first stand-alone novel. Did you already have the story time
ago or did you start to think about it when you finished The First Law?
I think when
you set up a big epic fantasy trilogy, finishing one of these books seems
impossible, you know? And when I was getting towards the end of the third book,
I thought “What will you do after this is finished?” And it was horrifying, and
I thought I might have to write another 30 or 50 books if I wanted to make of
this a career.
Ending
“It was horrible, I thought
I might have to write another 30 or 50 books if I wanted to make of this a
career”
So you needed some ideas...
I liked the
idea of writing something shorter, more focused. I didn’t want to do a huge
series of books, I wanted to write something that people could go back and
things still make sense, so I decided to write these standalone books, each of
them with a slightly different style; for sure, they’re not quite as heavy and
complicated, but they happen in the same world and pick up some minor
characters, pulling them to the foreground. And I was thinking of films, mostly,
to get the basic plotlines of these books. Point
Blank (John Boorman, 1967) was the basic structure for Best Served Cold, the gangster revenge thing. But I wanted to have
a female main character because I’ve been very male-focused on the trilogy.
You have seven big chapters, seven characters
on each team, seven cities and seven victims. Why seven?
I suppose
seven seemed like a good number. I thought about six or maybe five, but it would
have been to short or a bad length for me, and I think it works nicely. I
wanted this sort of repetition, a city, someone is killed… I like this idea,
but I wanted to make it as varied as possible, developing the villain’s
personalities and the cities, to give each one a real feel, which would then go
into the language in the whole sense of it. Sipani is a city with mist and…
Actually, Sipani is something close to the
anagram of a famous real country. Was that on purpose?
No, I don’t
think it was, but things happen. For example Styria seems to be a part of
Austria, and I didn’t realize this at the time, but the idea was giving as much
variety as I could, and I also think seven short stories unified into one whole
is a good thing.
You based the book on the Italian Renaissance
and a lot of names remind me of Latin: Vitari, Stolicus, Victus, Verturio, etc.
Was that on purpose?
Yes, my
approach to names is always to imitate real life, and I wanted them to sound
Italian or even Spanish, especially if I’m thinking in a given culture, because
that gives a special feeling and helps the reader to link things.
Style
“The point of view technique
gives you the best and worst of each character and it’s very involving for the
reader”
Why do you write following the point of view
technique?
It always made
sense to me; it’s the way to write. I think in the Tolkien era the trend was
writing in the omniscient style and it’s quite powerful, quite flexible, but it
gives you a sense of distance. I think it’s not as involving. The thing I like
of the point of view is that it gives you the best and worst of each character
in first person, it gives you a sense of immediacy but it allows you to keep
some secrets too, so it’s a very flexible way of writing though it’s very
involving too.
In between each bloc of chapters you wrote a
few pages of Monza’s (the main character) backstory.
She is very
ruthless, but we discover over time that she is greater than this. So the idea
was to use those chapters to reveal her back-story, a justification of her
reasons and maybe feel a bit different about that character at the time knowing
her trajectory better.
Monza ends up pregnant. Whose son is that?
Well, I suppose
you can leave without necessarily knowing. It could be Shivers’ or it could be
Rogont’s. You have the question, but you know it’s going to be raised as Rogont’s
son, although quite possibly it isn’t. I often like to write without being
certain about some things.
I think Nicomo Cosca is one of the best
characters of your story.
Yeah, I suppose
he’s the classic condottiero, the kind of the guy with a big sense of humour, a
guy with great qualities but also with massive and tragic flaws and flamboyant
personality. I was based a little on Don Quixote. And Nicomo Cosca appears in
the first three books too, but I was fascinated by the idea of a guy who is
fearless on the battlefields and has a huge charisma, but who is also a demagogue
and has a destructive and selfish influence.
Nicomo
Cosca “I was based a little on Don
Quixote because he’s someone with a big sense of humor and a flamboyant
personality”
George R.R. Martin wrote that Best Served Cold is your best book.
One thing I
really like of my standalone novels is that I wanted to try something slightly
different each time. The Heroes is a
war story with point of view but it takes place in certain time and place. Then,
Red Country is almost a western with
two central points of view, so is a bit more focused. I try to do different
things each time and as a result people differ on which is the book they like
the most and I’m very pleased with that, actually, because it keeps your
audience fresh. But I think Best Served
Cold is my most unpleasant book. It’s savage and the characters are darker.
I suppose I went as far as I wanted to go to make my characters unsympathetic.
I think some people find it too cold, though. I think I realized afterwards
that the fact of having unsympathetic characters forces you to question more
and more. So it’s, I think, my most divisive book, but that’s fine. I don’t
wanna be making everyone delighted all the time because you run the risk of
being bland.
You used to be a film editor.
I used to be
a film editor, mostly music, events and some documentaries too. But I began
writing at the same time.
I think I can see this in your style. On Best Served Cold, you play a lot with
parallel editing, at the Cardotti part, for instance. How has editing influenced
your writing style?
A lot, definitely.
You are influenced by everything you like and what you don’t like. So editing
helped me to pace the story. You also learn things. For example, if you are constructing
a sequence, you start to realize what you don’t need to show, so writing is
about the things you don’t write. You don’t have to describe everything. And
the classic mistake of the novel writer is to describe everything they see and
they are not focused on the important things.
Do you like Tarantino’s movies? Because I can
see a bit of The Bride in Monza…
Yeah, many
people said that and obviously they’re similar stories, but I don’t thing Kill Bill was an influence, I didn’t
like the film that much, although I think the tradition of revenging women is
one that goes back a long way: the Italian revenge dramas, the Shakespeare
stuff… I was weirdly thinking of Point Blank.
Tarantino’s last movie is a western, like your
last novel.
I like that
one a lot more. I think he’s an oddly frustrating filmmaker; Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction
were just brilliant at the time. But he became very distracted doing his take
on various themes, as I have done as well. I’ve obviously done it in a much
better way [Laughs]. So I liked Django
Unchained, although I found it uncomfortable because westerns tend to be quite
silent, so it was a strange combination.
Work
“I don’t want everyone
pleased with it because then I’d run the risk of being bland and I want to keep
my audience fresh”
You have recently signed a deal to write four
more novels. We know one will be another standalone book, but will the other three
be a trilogy?
Yes, they
will. That’s the plan. They’ll be shorter books, aimed partly at younger
audience, and they’ll be full of twists.
You are a young writer. Are you going to build
another entire world or are you planning to use The First Law one for a while?
This new
thing is a different world, certainly unrelated, so yes, I think I will but I
also think I’ll be coming back to The
First Law world, because I’m less interested in the world than in the
people in it, and I think there’s an infinite number of stories you can tell in
that world, after all. Plus I quite like the fact that you build up this
history and when you bring an incidental character you can choose a character
you’ve seen before who becomes more important. I like the sense of a living and
developing world.
Will we see a TV Series of this?
I hope so.
Have you got 300 million dollars?
Maybe after selling this interview…
If you do, give
me a call. You know there are always things going on but I think as a writer
you’ve got to focus on the writing and if a great filmmaker comes, fantastic,
but you can’t count on it. So I think in the end if the right set of people
wants to buy the rights perfect!
In your series there are kingdoms that want to
separate from the rest and others that want to gather together to become larger
entities. Here in Spain we have several regions, like Catalonia, that want to
become independent. What do you think about it?
Well, in the
UK we have both Wales and Scotland. It’s a tough one: where to draw the line? But
every case has a different history. For example, in Scotland violence rests in
the past while in the Basque country it’s quite recent. The Spanish civil war
is almost living memory and the British one is much more remote. I don’t know a
lot about Catalonia except that it makes nearly all the money, right? So that’s
a difficult one.
Universe
“I’m less interested in the
world than in the people in it, and I think there’s an infinite number of
stories you can tell in The First Law world”
- Interview with George R.R. Martin (A Song of Ice and Fire).
- Interview with Patrick Rothfuss (The Kingkiller Chronicle).
- Interview with Neil Gaiman (American Gods).
- Interview with Brandon Sanderson (Mistborn)
- Interview with Tim Powers (The Anubis Gates).
- Interview with Joe Abercrombie (The First Law series).
- Interview with Steven Erikson (Malazan Book of the Fallen).
- Interview with Adrian Tchaikovsky (Shadows of the Apt).
- Interview with Dmitry Glukhovsky (Metro 2033).
- Interview with Lisa Tuttle (Windhaven).
- Interview with David Simon (The Wire).
- Interview with Christopher Priest (The Prestige).
- Interview with Ian Watson (Artificial Intelligence).
- Interview with Robert J. Sawyer (FlashForward).
Cap comentari:
Publica un comentari a l'entrada